It has been a fascinating phenomenon in the discussion around publishing how adversarial people get around other people’s choices. So if someone says “I like an ebook,” a person will respond “Ohhh, I can’t believe—how can you do that?” It’s like that obnoxious person who you don’t want to go out to dinner with anymore because they can’t just order what they want, they have to comment on what you’re eating as well. What’s been epidemic in this discussion is that when both camps talk about their own preferences, they have to malign other people’s preferences too, and make grandiose extrapolations about the consequences of other people’s preferences for their own.
richard nash interview on revaluing the book. (via paperbackgirl)
-
citizenkerry likes this
-
art-and-copy likes this
-
gallantpieceofpaper reblogged this from paperbackgirl
-
heartliketwigs likes this
-
makeitwrite likes this
-
jrichmanesq likes this
-
igby reblogged this from paperbackgirl
-
hershapeinthedoorway likes this
-
pinkmacaroons likes this
-
myelegiaalone likes this
-
rachelfershleiser reblogged this from paperbackgirl
-
katunedited likes this
-
katiecar likes this
-
caity88 likes this
-
broocewayne likes this
-
pantherofroughstorms likes this
-
velocipedestrienne reblogged this from paperbackgirl
-
velocipedestrienne likes this
-
paperbackgirl posted this




